DR. DESHEILA RUMPH

Impact & Work

Selected work that reflects my experience supporting leaders, strengthening systems, building capacity, and translating improvement priorities into practice.

From Experience to Application

Translating Ideas Into Practical Support.

Much of my work has focused on helping leaders and teams move from broad priorities into practical structures, tools, routines, and supports that make implementation easier to understand and carry out.

Some of this work was developed independently. Other pieces were expanded through collaboration, professional learning, peer feedback, shared problem solving, and resources created by colleagues. In those cases, I identify the work as original and collaborative so that my contributions are clear while also acknowledging the work of others.

The examples featured here are selected to show how I organize complex work, strengthen implementation, support professional learning, and help create systems that are more coherent, usable, and sustainable.

Featured Work

Selected Examples of the Work in Practice.

These examples reflect work developed across different roles, settings, and professional experiences. Each collection represents an effort to turn identified needs into practical resources, structures, and supports that leaders and educators can use in their work.

Original & Collaborative Work

Culture

Structures and resources designed to support shared expectations, relationships, communication, organizational clarity, and the conditions that influence how people experience and carry out the work.

Original & Collaborative Work

Rigor

Structures, tools, and professional learning resources developed to strengthen shared understanding of rigorous practice and support educators as they translate expectations into instruction.

Practice Based Resource

Small Group Implementation

A structured approach to helping teachers organize, launch, and strengthen small group instruction by connecting expectations, routines, planning, and instructional practice.

A note about authorship: The Culture and Rigor collections include substantial structures and resources I developed and expanded, along with collaborative contributions and selected resources created by peers. Individual materials may therefore reflect different forms of authorship and contribution.

Original & Collaborative Work

Schoolwide Culture and Behavior Support

This body of work reflects structures, tools, and resources I developed, expanded, and organized to support a more coherent schoolwide approach to culture, behavior, expectations, relationships, and student support.

The work was informed by professional learning, established behavior support practices, prior school processes, implementation experience, feedback from colleagues, and collaborative problem solving. Some individual resources within the larger system were created by peers and incorporated as part of the broader schoolwide approach.

My contribution included helping build and strengthen the structure that connected shared expectations, universal routines, self regulation supports, recognition, reinforcement, and tiered responses into a more consistent system for students and staff.

Shared Expectations

Common language and clear expectations helped create consistency across classrooms and school settings.

Universal Routines

Consistent routines and procedures supported predictable expectations for students and staff.

Relationships and Regulation

Community building, reflection, emotional awareness, and regulation supports were integrated into the broader culture system.

Reinforcement and Support

Positive reinforcement and tiered supports created a clearer response system when students needed additional assistance.

Authorship note: This collection includes substantial original work I developed and expanded, as well as collaborative contributions and selected peer created resources. Individual materials may therefore reflect different sources of contribution.

Original & Collaborative Work

Rigor Observation and Instructional Support

This body of work reflects structures, tools, and professional learning resources I developed and expanded to help leaders and educators build a more consistent understanding of rigor and examine how rigorous practice appears in classrooms.

The work was shaped through professional practice, collaboration with peers, shared observation experiences, feedback, and resources contributed by colleagues. Some individual tools or materials within the larger collection were created by peers and incorporated into the broader observation and support process.

My contribution included helping develop and organize the process that connected standards, lesson context, expected evidence of rigor, classroom observation, evidence collection, debriefing, and data review into a more coherent instructional support system.

Prepare

Review standards, lesson context, pacing, assessment expectations, and other information that helps observers understand the intended learning.

Define Evidence

Establish a shared understanding of the student and teacher actions that provide evidence of rigorous learning.

Observe and Capture

Gather evidence related to instructional content, student thinking, classroom culture, academic discourse, and other agreed indicators.

Debrief and Learn

Review patterns in the evidence, discuss implications for instruction, and use the findings to identify support and next steps.

Authorship note: This collection includes substantial original structures and resources I developed and expanded, along with collaborative contributions and selected peer created materials. Individual resources may therefore reflect different sources of contribution.

Developed and Expanded Through Practice

Small Group Implementation

This work grew from a recurring implementation challenge. Teachers often understood the purpose of small group instruction but needed more support with the process of putting it into practice. Questions about organization, routines, student movement, independent work, planning, expectations, and instructional delivery could make implementation difficult to manage.

I developed a structured launch process that broke implementation into manageable steps. Rather than asking teachers to establish every component at once, the process introduced routines, expectations, organization, and instructional practices over time so that teachers and students could build consistency before adding greater complexity.

Although some versions used mathematics or English language arts content, the primary focus was the implementation process rather than a particular subject. I used and adapted this approach across multiple school settings, refining the structure based on teacher needs, implementation experience, and the context in which the work was being used.

Organize

Establish the physical structures, materials, groups, and routines needed to support the work.

Establish Expectations

Help students understand what to do, how to transition, how to work independently, and what successful participation looks like.

Launch Gradually

Introduce components intentionally so that routines become established before the system becomes more complex.

Strengthen Practice

Use observation, teacher feedback, student needs, and implementation evidence to refine the process over time.

The focus is not simply small group content. The focus is building a process that makes successful small group implementation manageable.

Development note: The implementation structure was developed and expanded through my professional practice across multiple settings. Subject specific content, instructional materials, and supporting resources incorporated into the process may come from multiple sources.

Across the Work

Building Practical Solutions Around Real Needs.

Although these examples address different areas of practice, a common pattern connects the work. Each began with a need that required more than simply identifying what people should do. The challenge was helping create the structures and support needed to make the work usable in practice.

My role has often involved taking complex expectations, ideas, resources, and feedback and organizing them into something people can understand and use. That may involve developing a new structure, expanding an existing process, bringing several resources together, or working collaboratively with others to strengthen what already exists.

The work also continues after a resource or structure is developed. Implementation provides new information. Feedback reveals what is clear and what is not. Experience shows where additional support is needed. Those lessons can then be used to strengthen the work over time.

Identify the Need

Understand the problem people are trying to solve and what may be making the work difficult to carry out.

Build or Strengthen

Develop, organize, adapt, or connect resources and structures around the identified need.

Support Use

Help people understand the structure, apply it within their work, and develop greater confidence with implementation.

Refine Through Practice

Use experience, evidence, and feedback to determine what should be clarified, strengthened, expanded, or adjusted.

The value of a resource is not simply that it exists. The value is whether it helps people understand the work and put it into practice.

Explore the Work

See How the Work Has Been Organized and Applied.

Explore selected examples of the structures, tools, and implementation resources connected to Culture, Rigor, and Small Group Implementation.